I’m pleased to announce that I’ll be presenting Cloud Music: Audience participation in electronic music , at the the 2019 Vu 3 Symposium in Park City, Utah!
Cloud Music is a work for audience participation and cloud computing. Audience members load a website on their mobile device, specify values, and then submit those values to a web server. The web server is periodically polled by a Max patch, which uses the user-specified data to launch Cloud sprites, which then drift across the screen. If a user specifies that a cloud should be a thunder cloud, it reacts with other thunder clouds.
Cloud Music is the first proof of concept in an ongoing project to unify audience participation, cloud computing, and interactive performance.
The New York City Electroacoustic Music Festival (NYCEMF) is always a fun time with great music and incredible people. This year they’re hosting the International Computer Music Conference as well, and I’m pleased to announce that Tempest in a Teakettle, which I presented there in 2017, will be returning to the program for this year as well.
I am pleased to inform you that your work: REVERIE OF SOLITUDEwas selected for the third edition of Diffrazioni – Firenze Multimedia Festival – March 26-31, 2019 sound, light, art, technology, neuroscience, nanotechnology, robotics.
It’s November, National Novel Writing Month, which means it’s time for another tape piece!*
*For some of you this might seem to be a non-sequitur, so let me explain. While I was in Norman, our group would have a creativity pact every November. Walter (writer of some of my best program notes) would participate in NaNoWriMo, Steven would work on album tracks, I’d write a tape piece. Prep work could be done outside of November, but the bulk of the work had to happen between the kickoff doughnut night at Donut King on Lindsey street (10 PM on Mondays), progress reports would be assessed at subsequent doughnut Mondays, and the project had to be completed in time for the December Third holiday meal. If you didn’t finish your project, you owed the winners a cake.
Given that I just finished that saxophone and percussion piece and I had a pair of finger cymbals lying around, I thought it would be cool to do a piece totally from finger cymbal sounds.
Turns out, finger cymbals only really have about one sound, so this project has been harder than I thought. To make it more interesting, I’m trying to write this as a tape piece AND as a finger cymbals and tape piece.
Last week, Pipe Dreams–a piece I started writing in 2009, received its second premiere, this time by the NDSU Wind Symphony.
Second premiere? Am I even allowed to do that? Well, I did.
Pipe Dreams started out as the last thing I’d write as an undergrad, and the first thing I’d work on as a grad student…and as a doctoral student…and as a “professional” composer. It received its first premiere in May of 2009 as a percussion octet. It was the first piece of mine accepted to a conference (an SCI Regional Conference at Kansas State in 2010). It brought me some attention with the Oklahoma Composers Association, which was my first real commission. Anyone who has played anything of mine written since will realize the beginnings of my infatuation with time signatures.
And then it was a slacker. I added a couple of movements to it, but neither movement was as impressive as the original. I came back to it again in 2012, reworking it into a band piece. And then I returned once more in 2014, tweaking the orchestration.
Because this piece exists in a bunch of different versions, I thought I’d run through how the piece developed.
Nine-and-a-half years later, here we are. It’s still a fun piece…but let’s not forget the best version of all: the 8-bit version.
My parents and I
watch a lot of procedural crime dramas. Law and Orders of all varieties, NCIS,
CSI, The Closer, and recently CK and I discovered Crossing Lines on Netflix.
But my parents are obsessed with Criminal Minds. It’s basically all they watch.
They’re either watching Criminal Minds or going to Menards.
In episode 8 of
season 3, shortly after Gideon is replaced by Rossi, Morgan and Rossi are
having a conversation in which both of them, at some point, utter the phrase
“I was giving you an opportunity for personal growth”. This has
become part of the Vanderburg lexicon, usually said in some sort of sarcastic
way. Or, whenever dealing with things is hard.
I’m writing this
percussion and saxophone piece. As it turns out, writing for multi-percussion
is really hard, in really stupid ways. Despite having a basic background in
percussion (go PBHS Drumline!), picking instruments was impossible. Where do I
start? In an instrument group that includes basically anything I can imagine
(and some things I can’t), how do I narrow down the number of instruments to
something that is both engaging and logistical?
A second issue deals
with the difficulty of the music. If I usually write rhythmic music, and
percussionists are all about rhythm, then I need to up my rhythm game and write
something nigh-impossible, right? Right?
The piece started out as a groove piece–like so much of my recent pieces (see also: Earmarks, Austerity, Joyride…). How do I keep from making this whole piece a groove piece? Or should it be?
Also, relying on
computer playback for things like “swirled superball mallet” isn’t
really a thing.
Most of these
problems are mental–It’s seemed like I’ve been trying to drink from a
firehose. Some of the problems have gone away by introducing boundaries. It’s
like Stravinsky said, “The more constraints one imposes, the more one
frees one’s self. And the arbitrariness of the constraint serves only to obtain
precision of execution.” This was often expressed in my graduate lessons
as “Give me limitations and I’ll give you the world”.
Some of these problems are solved by research–Steven Schick’s lecture “On the Bridge” helped tremendously, as did just listening to percussion things on YouTube.
Some of these
problems are being solved by technology. Recording samples that I want to use,
then dropping them into Pro Tools instead of using Sibelius, and then notating
Overall, it’s a fun
project–and an opportunity for personal growth.
CK and I agreed that
we wouldn’t travel much this summer. Maybe a conference, visit some family, but
no 25-state road trip and no taking 300 high schoolers to Europe.
That idea was short
lived, because here’s what we ended up doing:
I’m going to paste a bunch of pictures, since I couldn’t do that before but now with WordPress I CAN!
The summer travel
extravaganza started with CK judging the Musical Merit Competition in San
Diego, while I drove to Missouri to visit my parents. CK joined a few days
later, and we did our usual visit to Elephant Rocks and Johnsons Shut-ins. I
broke down and finally bought an iPhone. And then it was back to Fargo.
Where we almost
instantly put an offer on a house.
We’d been wanting to
not live in an apartment since the moment we moved into our apartment, and we’d
been surfing Zillow for months, and we’d spent a few weeks looking, and the
night we got back from Missouri–after a day of driving from Omaha to Fargo, we
unloaded our bags and went and looked at three houses, putting an offer on one.
The offer was accepted, and then we…left town again.
Trip number 3 was CK
going to Madison for the MACRO theory conference. Trip number 4 was me flying
down to Oklahoma to work with Jonathan Nichol and Marvin Lamb to record
Marvin’s expanded Tenor Saxophone quintet, Woodcuts (previously: HERD!). Three
incredibly busy days spent in OU’s recording studio before flying back to
Here’s Marvin’s Woodcuts and Bartleby:
Shortly thereafter we headed west to Montana to visit CK’s family. Since our travels were far from over, we took Bartleby to stay with the Keoghs for the summer. Bartleby wasn’t thrilled with the car ride.
But I got my annual
picture of Woodbine Creek
And Woodbine Falls
And, you know,
And then it was back
The sixth trip was
the big one. The International Clarinet Association’s CLARINETFEST® was held in
Oostende, Belgium this year. Last summer, CK asked if I’d be interested in
writing a clarinet-saxophone-piano trio for NDSU’s Boreas Ensemble, to be
premiered in Belgium. I said yes, knowing that if it got accepted I’d get to
write a fun piece, and if it didn’t, I’d get credit for being agreeable. Well,
it was accepted, the piece got written, and on the fourth of July we landed in
Earmarks was commissioned by the Boreas Ensemble at North Dakota State University, and despite my best efforts, it took on a vaguely political theme. In the early stages of writing this piece, I shared online the idea of writing a work for piano, clarinet, and saxophone where the piano played for as long as the performer chose, the wind players were silent, and I’d call the entire thing “Filibuster”, after the political tactic of talking for as long as possible to delay any actual work being done. Among the comments egging me on, there were a handful of those who dissented. Oh, they agreed with my incredibly clever title idea, but they balked at the idea of a piece of music, especially one without a text, being political. After all, they said, Stravinsky tells us that music is unable to express anything.
I’m perhaps the wrongest person to tackle that criticism or to write a political piece, and the idea of writing a piece about politics in the United States in 2018 seems like cheating. It’s too easy. There’s already so much being said. And I’ve never considered myself a political activist–I’m far too introverted for that. I reject the notion that our political discourse is only effective when it’s loud, obnoxious, and riddled with expletives. I think that sometimes change is affected through the church sermon that makes you uncomfortable enough to put a little more in the offering plate. Sometimes change is achieved through laughtivism. Sometimes all it takes is a bit of quiet solitude in a voting booth.
And so, Earmarks is a musical (and hopefully humorous) view of some of the issues in today’s political climate, designed to make you make you laugh–or to make you think. And definitely to make you talk.
It starts out with Echo Chamber, where everything you hear is everything you want to hear. As we move more and more of our lives online, we’re at the mercy of algorithms that try to deliver more of what we like–and give us options for removing that which we don’t. The more time we spend in these echo chambers, the less we hear from dissenters. (The piano tries to come in with a new idea later in the movement, but is largely ignored).
The second movement, Filibuster, does what I initially intended. Although all three instruments do get to play, it’s a lot of repeated, pleasant-sounding milquetoast stuff without a great deal of substance that never really resolves. And it has a repeat sign at the end that allows it to be played as many times as the performers wish. How long this movement is depends entirely on the whim of the pianist.
A swing state is a state with a similar level of support for both parties that can go either way during an election. Likewise, Swing States is a piece for saxophone and piano, and a piece for clarinet and piano, and it’s a struggle to see who’s going to win. Will they sort out their differences? Will we?
Political opinions–like works of art, scientific discoveries, and everything else of value–are only improved when they are allowed to be constructively criticized, discussed, and defended.
Earmarks receives its premiere on July 9 at Clarinetfest in Ostend, Belgium.
When I started blogging like nine years ago, I started a blog with WordPress. As I built Liszt up and tried to do everything in-house, I moved the entire blog to Liszt. After working to streamline Liszt as much as possible, there’s not much need for a blog function. And also Liszt didn’t have fantastic image capabilities for blog posts, and I really want to start posting pictures of my cat.